🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume nuclear discussions with the United States provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed recent overtures had come from mediators to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Course

Araghchi is navigating a complex course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president asserting the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their right to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in certain ways if discussions reopen.

Trump recently stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, designed to portray the US as a controlling nation that misuses the concept of global regulations, Araghchi said the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the attacks began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Continues the Final Answer

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always tried to impose their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and stays the primary answer to address conflicts, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and respect, they will get a answer in the same tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We acquired multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the country in the wake of this attack."